Enemy

Start reading this post with an open mind.

You are an enemy of the United States.  Why?  Because you hate the freedom that those ignorant and arrogant westerners enjoy.  Your teacher in school gave you this opinion and you have thought this way ever since.  You hate how they have "rights" and that women can walk around as if there is no man to tell them what to do and when to do it.  You hate that they can say whatever they want, however they want, whenever they want.  You hate this so much, that you begin to devote your entire life to jihad and the destruction of the Western way of life.  After all, your religious beliefs tell you to eliminate all infidels that do not convert to the religion of Islam.  You also hate that many of the people that share your religion, do not share your interpretation of your religion, and your disdain for America and the western way of life. 

You remember back to that day in 2001 when Islam was victorious against the infidels.  Ever since that day you have looked up to that man who was responsible for those acts and wills of Allah.  It was that man who gave you courage and the ambition to try and squeeze every last drop of freedom from the infidels.  Since then, you have been trying to compose a brilliant plan to destroy the Westerners freedom.  You received help from the very people who you wish to destroy when they sent weapons to the Middle East to aid us rebels in our fight for Shariah.  You also realize that the leaders of that vile country will not retaliate against for attack.  They will only apologize for anything they have done to you, even when they have done nothing at all.  This makes it that much easier for you to decide what has to be done.

It has been some time since your quest for Shariah to reign supreme around the world.  Now, you believe you have concocted a plan that cannot be stopped and will not fail.  A few weeks ago you noticed a trailer for a movie that denounces and smears the name of your beloved prophet.  This video angers you, and fuels the fire to take away the Westerners freedom.  Suddenly it hits you.  The perfect plan.  You show this video to your fellow crusaders for Shariah and they to believe your plan will work.

You hate that their is an embassy representing the vile West in your land and it makes it an easy target to attack.  It makes the person representing the infidels an even easier target to kill.  You will follow this representative to learn his schedules and learn his routine.  You plan the attack for the anniversary of Islam's victory against the United States.  You plan to continue the work of the great one who you have admired for all these years.  You will use the weapons supplied by the Americans and some of your own RPG's.  You will gather your posse by showing them the video that sparked this plan and tell them that they must not get away with this.  You will send the mob to create chaos and confusion knowing that this chaos and confusion will spread to other Islamic countries around the globe.  When the time is right you and your other conspirators will grab the Ambassador and drag him for a victory lap.  Once you are done you will kill him.

Once this act has been executed the media of the United States will focus on the seemingly apparent reason for this uproar.  A 14 minute video on the internet that mocks our prophet.  You too will cry out against this video, citing it for the riots and reason for killing, knowing full well of what your intentions are.  When the media and leaders of the United States start citing the video as the reason, you know your plan will succeed.  When they do this, you and your other brothers, including the newly-"elected" President of Egypt, will cry for limitations and abolition of the free-speech of Americans.  You know that many in the UN, including the hard-working leader of Iran, will agree with these talks of limitations and abolition.  Once a goal that you never thought was possible has now become reality.  The freedoms of America have finally started to be eroded away.  Who would have thought that a nation that was once so impenetrable could now be influenced from the other side of the globe.  You rejoice for your accomplishment.  You have succeeded in continuing the work of the one who started the work 11 years ago.  It will not be long until the caliphate has been restored and Shariah and Allah will reign supreme throughout the world.

*N

let's just think about this for a minute...

Okay, let's concede for a minute that Bush's failed policies over the eight years previous to Obama becoming president was the only reason Obama inherited such a dismal, darn near over the cliff, economy.  Think about this for a minute....why the hell would he want to make it worse?!!!!  Could it be that it furthers his progressive agenda?

*M

Were we supposed to sit on our hands?

I'm glad that our President has time to appear on late night talk shows while the Middle East burns, aren't you?  Anyways, the President was on Letterman the other night and I watched it and something that he said got me asking some questions.  Letterman told the President that at the RNC they had a debt clock and it was counting up really fast and he asks the President, "What is that?"  The President responds with talking about a surplus during the Clinton years.  He then proceeds to talk about how we launched two wars, which we paid for by using a credit card.  Let's stop right there.  Mr. President, were we supposed to just sit back like nothing happened after those planes hit the twin towers?  You hear Democrats all the time talking about two unjustified wars that the United States have forced upon others.  Really, unjustified.  I mean we were attacked and nearly 3,000 American citizens were killed an audacious and evil attack, and we were supposed to do nothing.  See Mr. President, President Bush didn't apologize to Al-Qaeda for America being the greatest nation on earth.  No, he said we are going to find the people responsible for this and take them out.  So, while the wars weren't great for the spending problem(any war never is), I think it was justified to go after the people who tried, and succeeded, to kill Americans.

*N

hello walls...

We are always reminded that there are liberal walls around Madison.  The latest example is the Dane Co judge who deemed Act 10 unconstitutional.  While once again legislating from the bench, a liberal ignored the mandate from the recall.  Why the hell spend all the money on the recall when this was really the goal?

*M

The Hypocritical Left

When will the hypocrisy end?  My guess...never.  The Democrats and hardcore leftist will continue to blindly throw lies at an imaginary dart board until something sticks and the leftist media rolls with it.  And I can’t stand to hear one of these lies or blatant falsehoods, such as "Republicans hate senior citizens!"  Or, "Conservatives don't want the homeless to be fed!," without wanting to pick up my TV and throw it out the window.   

Representative James Clyburn (D-SC) decided that his party was lacking, in the category of lies, that he decided to throw another one out in the open for everyone to hear.  He was giving an interview about faith and politics and said something that I thought was blatantly hypocritical.  He started out by saying, "No campaign should be based on faith."  He than continues by saying, “Democrats, by and large, have always been pretty strict adherents to the Constitution," “We believe in the separation of church and state.”  (wow)  Seriously, he said this.  That statement comes from the party where many Democrats want to strip American citizens of their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms to defend themselves.  Then he delivers one of the most offensive and hypocritical statements I have ever heard.  He states, “What we’ve gotten from a lot of my Republican friends has been a lot of recitations of their faith, but when it comes time to fulfill what we find in Matthew 25 — do ‘unto the least of these’ — to them there‘s something wrong with feeding people when they’re hungry.  This is not the Christian way that you do things.”  

Excuse me Congressman!  May I direct you to a little event that one of my role models put on in late July.  You may have heard of it, Restoring Love.(Maybe not because it wasn’t covered by the Mainstream leftist media..)  Yes, It was Mr. Glenn Beck who asked for support from his fellow conservatives to send food donations to Texas, so that it could be distributed to food pantries in need across the country.  It was conservatives and freedom-lovers that sent 12 tractor trailers full of food and clothing to 11 different areas in need of food.  Two trucks went to the Navajo Indian reservation. (Maybe Elizabeth Warren was there, considering her newly discovered lineage.)  There is no doubt that conservatives will spring to action when people are in need.  However, there are some people getting in the way of our help for our fellow man.  It has been the Democratic mayors, in numerous cities around the country, that have lead the way in legal action against feeding the homeless in our communities.  May I direct you to just a couple of different instances where bans against feeding the homeless and hungry have been introduced.  

A recent case is that of the City of Philadelphia.  Where, Democratic Mayor Michael Nutter introduced a ban on feeding the homeless in public parks.  Seriously!  I guess there must be a perfectly good explanation for this, Mr. Mayor?  I mean, there are people starving and you are stopping good, decent people from feeding them.  Nutter stated that the ban would, “protect the dignity of the homeless, cleanliness of the parks, and eliminate food health concerns.”  I’m pretty sure that the homeless people know that they are homeless and just want some decent food.  Luckily, a federal judge struck down this un-christian like ban.

Another example of the Democratic Party banning the feeding of homeless persons, comes from Houston, TX.  In early 2011 the City of Houston, who’s mayor at the time(and current mayor) was Annise Parker (D), prohibited a Texas couple from feeding the homeless.  Those two generous Texans started a Christian based initiative called, “Feed A Friend,” that served anywhere from 60-120 people every night until the operation was shut down by the city.  Kathy Barton from the Health and Human Services Department of Houston stated, “Anyone serving food for public consumption, whether for the homeless or for sale, must have a permit.”    The reasoning for shutting down this Christian operation was, “poor people are the most vulnerable to foodborne illness and also are the least likely to have access to health care."  I think that the homeless will take their chances with the foodborne illness and the lack of healthcare in order to get a hot meal.  This excuse is such a pathetic one because they had no good reason to stop this couple from serving food.  The only plausible reason that I could think of is that they want the Government to do all of the distribution of food.  They wan’t the homeless to be dependent on the Government.

A final case comes to you from the, progressive-infested, liberal stronghold that is, New York City.   We all know who the Mayor of NYC is, Nanny Bloomberg.  I know what your saying... “Bloomberg was a Republican!”  Yes he was, and may I say that he never belonged in the realm of Conservatism.  He switched to Democrat, and then to Independent, but he isn’t fooling anybody.  If you look at his policies he aligns completely with the Democratic-Progressive platform.  He just doesn’t want to say he is a Progressive because he knows it will lose him points in the political arena.  He just can never seem to just sit back and count his $22 billion net worth.  Nope, he always has to be pushing regulation down the throats of his constituents.  (Not surprisingly, however, many do not seem to mind)  From the banning of large sugary drinks to the city-wide ban on firearms, Bloomberg has done what most Progressives dream of doing.  He has also banned donations to food pantries in NYC.  His reasoning for doing this is because the city can’t determine the salt, fat and fiber content of the donations.  Mr. Nanny I don’t think the people that don’t get a solid meal everyday care about the salt, fat and fiber content of the food that they obtain through local food pantries.  And I’ve got news for you Bloomberg.  If I am ever in NYC and I see somebody in need of food and all I have is the saltiest bag of Fritos, I’m going to give that bag to them.  

So, Congressman Clyburn, I think those three cases of Democratic (and Democratic aligning) mayors, obstructing the will of the people to do good, shows the hypocrisy of your party.  I am sick of moronic Democratic Congressmen, like yourself, saying that Conservatives don’t care about anybody but themselves.  Because the truth is, we care about those in need, and we believe in the American people to take care of their fellow man.  We also don’t believe that the Federal Government should have it’s hands in the issues that matter to a specific community.  I also ask, Congressman, to be prepared for this November, because the American people are waking up and seeing right through your hypocritical lies.  We will be at the ballot box on November 6th, and we will be victorious.  

*N 

"We've Heard It All Before"

Great Ad by the RNC

*N

...

Wait....What!?

*N

Romney and Ryan Spells Victory and Substance

I didn't think Romney had it in him.  I had been loosely following the possible VP choices for months and Ryan's name was always in the mix but I though he would go with a more vanilla choice.  By picking Ryan Romney has essentially stated that he is going to make this election about substantive issues like taxation, jobs,  health care, and the outlandish levels of national spending.  This is going to give Romney the conservative vote that has been waffling on supporting him all along as well as the disillusioned independent voters who are ready for real debate on tough issues.

Anyway, the prediction:
Romney/Ryan  52%
Obama/Biden 48%

*S

need I say more (part 3)...

"YOU DIDN'T BUILD THAT" 

*M