Guns and the 2nd Amendment a Very Important Aspect of This Presidential Campaign

The 2nd Amendment has been under fire from leftists and Progressives since the early 1900's.  You see, the left believes that guns kill people, instead of the common sense logic that people kill people.  It is also their belief that if you take guns away from the American people they will ultimately be powerless, and this is very true.  If the big hand of Government comes down and grabs guns in one clean swoop, they will have no one to oppose them from transforming America into some sort of socialist or communist Government.  If all of what Mr. Glenn Beck says is true, and I believe that most of it is, then grabbing guns will be a vital part of their plan because sooner or later people will wake up and if they have guns they can indeed be persuasive, and stop the Government.  In no way am I advocating or telling people to go out and charge the capital or the white house with their guns, I am simply examining the mental side and the power that a gun has, simply when it is just sitting in your hands or at home.

I believe that if President Obama gains a second term as President he will ultimately make gun control a top issue of his administration.  I believe he will start out by having Mr. Cass Sunstein create crippling regulations on firearm and ammunition manufacturers, or perhaps, a convenient tax will be placed on ammunition.  Ultimately, making the manufacturers jack up their prices to make a profit, thus making guns and ammunition unaffordable to the average citizen.  I also wouldn't put it past him to just start out by taking guns away.  This is why I believe that Guns and the 2nd Amendment are one of the top, if not the top, issue in this year's Presidential and Congressional elections.  I urge you to stand with the NRA and other organizations who are fighting for your 2nd Amendment rights.

*N

Prediction: Walker/Republican Nominee wins = cries of voter fraud

I have been doing some thinking and have come up with a reasonable hypothesis.  If you look at the method that George Soros uses to collapse countries and currencies, you will notice that his last step is to cry voter fraud.  Soros' method can be seen here: PART I & PART II.  Anyways, you may have noticed that national and state voter ID laws have come under heavy fire with some being strongly opposed to some being blocked by courts.  It's interesting, it seems like such a basic concept to have somebody who is voting to prove that they are, indeed, who they say that they are.  It's common sense and a no-brainer.  However, the leftists do not think so.  They say that it will unfairly target minorities and senior citizens who may not have a drivers license and may not be able to get to the DMV to obtain a valid ID.  It also hinders the ability for illegals to vote, which is why it is common sense, to us normal minded people, but to them it violates their human or universal rights.  I'm sorry, but we don't live under universal rights we live under our Constitution.  Anyways,  I believe that they may be blocking voter ID for another reason.

If Soros' plan is plausible, and I think it is, they could be blocking voter ID laws so that they CAN cry voter fraud.  They will say that there is voter fraud and there won't be any way of proving that there wasn't because the poll attendants weren't asking to see voters' IDs.

This may be one big conspiracy theory, and call me crazy, but I believe that it is plausible considering the way that our country is headed and what these so called "elected" leaders are doing to our country.  It is all orchestrated and planned and they are all playing the game together, and they are winning.  However, it is our turn to take our country back and I believe that we will win in the end.

*N

Progressives...Moving America towards "Political System X" since 1900.

It was Stuart Chase who first outlined this plan in his book, "The Road We're Traveling."  If I may point out here, the title of this book is very similar title to Barack Obama's new documentary(propaganda film), "The Road We've Traveled."  Chase outlines this plan by Progressives that showed that we were on a road to a new ideology that would succeed capitalism, and he is in favor of it.  Chase was not sure if it was state capitalism, socialism, communism, etc, so he called it "Political System X."  Chase outlined the basic plan that has been used by progressives since the early 1900's when the party was started.  Since then they have succeeded in mostly completing Phase One.  Now they are on to Phase two, and Phase three will soon be here if we do not do something.

PHASE 1: INFILTRATE

• Infiltrate & organize groups for control: EX: TIDES foundation, Media Matters, the Media, OWS, etc.
• Create Shadow Government (structure for Phase Three)
• Infiltrate: Government, Labor, Wall Street, Education, Media, Military, Courts, etc.
• Weaken: Faith, Youth, Heritage, Community
• Confuse concept of Right vs. Wrong
• Bring ALL into state of NEAR CRISIS

PHASE 2: CRISIS

• Allow Chaos: OWS not charged with any crimes, while Tea Party's are, nothing being done about Black Panthers or Louis Farrakhan who are inciting violence.
• Encourage Chaos when possible: Politicians supporting OWS
• Enforce Negative Stereotypes
• Isolate/Destroy/Discourage "Truth"
• Encourage Reckless Habits
• Remain in Shadows

PHASE 3: POLITICAL SYSTEM X

• Grab control to "protect
• "Liquidate" those who oppose or have been outlived: Tea Party/OWS
• Activate Shadow System
• Remain in CRISIS Mode

That plan allows for the Bottom to Rise Up(OWS), the Top to come down to control the chaos(Government), and the system to turn inside out(Political System X).  The brilliance of this plan is that the people at the bottom creating the chaos are being told what to do by the people at the top who will come down and grab power.  Once they come down and grab the power, the people at the top won't need the "useful idiots" anymore and they will kill them because they know the plan and who is behind it all.  It is just like every robbery movie that we've seen.  Once the henchmen bring the money to the leader, they are now longer needed, and they are killed.  Glenn Beck outlined this plan on GBTV last week and you can find it here.

*N

black gold, Texas tea...

It is very confusing as to why President Obama finds it ok for the USA to use oil pumped from holes in Saudi Arabia but not from holes here in the US.  According to the President, it won't do any good to drill and pump more here but on the other hand he is asking for more production form the Saudis.  Logic would dictate it really shouldn't matter from what hole in the ground the oil comes from NOT to make a difference!

*M

Congressman Davis Accepts Award from Communist Party Media Outlet

I don't think that I need to write much here.  It just goes to show how the entire Democratic Party has been hijacked with Progressives and Communists.

Go to breitbart.tv to see the video:  http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/12/The%20Vetting%20Obamas%20Favorite%20Congressman%20Hangs%20At%20Communist%20Party%20HQ

Go to theblaze.com to see the story:  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/video-reportedly-shows-dem-rep-receiving-award-from-communist-media-arm/

*N

thank you... thank you very much...

In light of the recent comments by Rush Limbaugh, it would seem once again that the progressives and left are showing the hypocrisy they that has become their M.O.  With a complicit mainsteam media, they continue to tear apart conservatives who, whether they apologize or not, make inappropriate comments while at the same time honoring those on the left who, at the very least, make comments that are equally inflammatory.

Let's put a little different spin on this issue.  Maybe progressives really do feel conservatives should be held to a higher standard. And maybe conservatives should take it as a compliment. It is better to be held to a higher standard than allow ourselves to be ok with falling to a lower standard.  When the ends, justify the means, it is much easier to become a hypocrite. In a strange sort of way, maybe we should be thanking them.  Most people will see right through the hypocrisy.

*M

Skeptic of KONY 2012

               

               I read the words of our Founders and I think most of what they have written or spoken still ring true today.  Thomas Jefferson said, in a letter to his nephew, "Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear."  I always find myself going back to those words whenever a new movement or "party" comes along.  There was no exception when KONY 2012 came across my newsfeed about a week ago.  


              When I saw KONY 2012 I was immediately intrigued and had to find out what this movement was all about.  I watched the 30 minute video and could quickly see that the video was just a video telling it's audience what their cause is.  Ok, not being satisfied, I decided to do some more digging to find out just who these people (Invisible Children) are.

              Invisible Children is a not for profit organization that has been dedicated to fighting Kony and the LRA in Africa.  I took a look at their financial report that they had posted on their website and found the special thanks section.  In their I chose a random organization and I made a few connections to other organizations:

     In the special thanks section of their report, they (Invisible Children) gave a shout out to Humanity United.  Now, I do not know how "tight" these two organizations are, but if Invisible Children is thanking them they have to have dialogue and meetings from at least time to time to maybe much more than that.  Anyways, Humanity United is partnered with many organizations, but two in particular caught my eye.  Those two were none other than Center For American Progress and the TIDES Foundation (Organizations funded directly by George Soros).  Yup, George Soros managed to find a way to get his hand in this.  Plus, there are some other interesting ties that the senior leadership at Humanity United have.  


     Peter Rundlet has been the Vice President of Investments of Humanity United since 2010.  Mr. Rundlet has had a very intriguing career.  He was the Deputy Staff Secretary for President Obama, and Vice President for National Security and International Policy at (none other than) the Center For American Progress.  Isn't that great?


     Along with Mr. Rundlet, David Abramowitz, who is the Vice President for Policy & Government Relations at Humanity United, has appeared on the Center For American Progress website.  Also, Mike Boyer, who is the Vice President for Strategic Communications at Humanity United was a "regular expert commentator on television and radio outlets such as Al Arabiya, Al Jazeera..." according to his bio. 


               As you can see there are some very interesting players at Humanity United, but the real question is how close are they with Invisible Children?  That is the one connection that is the farthest stretch, but none the less, it is a connection that must be considered.  You can see more counterarguments at theblaze.com and visiblechildren.tumblr.com.  


               As for my opinion on KONY 2012, I don't think that I would go and start supporting this organization with donations and time.  There is no doubt the Joseph Kony is a very evil man and what he has done can not be justified in any way.  However, I believe that there are bigger problems within our own borders, and I would support an organization dedicated to fighting those problems before KONY 2012.  Not to mention all of the information that I acquired during my brief research.  George Soros is a very big player in the decline of our currency and any organization that he has a tie to, I do not support.  Also, any organization that has a left leaning agenda, which I think Invisible Children does, I do not support.  I also believe that this spontaneous campaign is out to create young activists.  There is no doubt that this campaign is directed straight at the youth of America.  If I had any money to bet I would bet all of it on that these kids that become very involved in this campaign will be exposed to another campaign and agenda.  OBAMA 2012.  The left will take every chance they can to infiltrate this movement further than they already have.  I wouldn't be surprised if Soros starts throwing money directly at the Invisible Children organization.  So, I am going to steer clear of this "grassroots" movement.  


               As for some final advice to you, it comes in just three words...Question with Boldness.  




*N 


                

Thoughts on SUPER TUESDAY

               Yesterday was SUPER TUESDAY and it was eventful one at that.  Romney was the total state winner where he won 6 states to Santorum's 3 and Gingrich's 1.  Mr. Paul failed to win any states last night (but is anyone surprised?).  Some will say that Romney was the big winner because of the win in Ohio.  However, I don't think that is the case.  In a state where Mr. Romney outspent Mr. Santorum 12 to 1, he only managed to win by 12,000+ votes.  In my mind it is a pretty huge statement made by Rick Santorum.  He went out and said, “Hey despite not having any money to compete against Romney, my message is resonating with people and I am the right guy for the job.”  Rick Santorum despite only winning three states, that include, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and North Dakota,  has solidified himself as the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney.  I urge Mr. Gingrich to put his ego aside and drop out of the race to let Santorum lead the way.  There is now doubt that at least half of Gingrich’s 170,000+ votes from Ohio, would have gone to Rick Santorum, ultimately winning the state for him. 

               One thing that continues to grind my gears this primary season is the fact that people continue to vote for candidates that have dropped out of the race.  Just last night in Ohio, which was the most crucial state, there was 11,000+ votes that went to Rick Perry and John Huntsman.  I commend the voters who did this for going out and voting, but come on.  How on earth is this helping our cause when you are voting for candidates who are no longer perusing the Presidency.  It is just one of those things that you see every primary, but continues to piss you off.  Let’s get real and start focusing on the guy that is still in the race that best represents our values as conservatives.  

*N

"We The People"

*N

Ironic

Wisdom once again provided by one of those cute email forwards.  Thanks Uncle David!:

Isn't It Ironic? The food stamp program, part of the Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Department of Agriculture, asks us to "please do not feed the animals" because the animals may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.

*S

NUDGE

"The civil rights movement was hard. Winning the vote for women was hard. Making sure that workers had some basic protections was hard," 

"Around the world, Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, what they did was hard. It takes time. It takes more than a single term. It takes more than a single president. It takes more than a single individual."

"What it takes is ordinary citizens who keep believe, who are committed to fighting and pushing and inching this country closer and closer to our highest ideals. And I said in 2008, 'that I am not a perfect man and I will not be a perfect president.' But I promised you, but I promised you, I promised you back then that I would always tell you what I believe. I would always tell you where I stood." 


Those were some quotes from a recent speech that the President gave at one of his fundraiser events.  It appears that Obama is comparing the work that he has done to that of Gandhi and Nelson Mandela.  We should be used to this by now with all of the leftists continually praising this man's failures and wrong-doings, but it is hard to get over the crap that comes out of his mouth.  However, there were some words that caught my attention.  When he says, "What it takes is ordinary citizens who keep believing, who are committed to fighting and pushing and inching this country closer and closer to our highest ideals."  I don't know how much clearer it can be.  That way of thinking, or inching, has been laid out for us by Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstien.  Sunstien wrote a book called NUDGE.  In this book he talks about how you can't force radical change onto a society all at once, you have to continually nudge the citizens, little by little, until you reach the finish line.  That is the exact plan that the progressives have been following for the last 100 years.  The 100 year plan.  Progress.


Another line that caught me was when he says, "It takes more than a single individual."  His way of thinking is that, "You can't make it by yourself anymore. You need the Government in order to survive."  It's all about making you more dependent on the Government so that they can gain power.  It is all so clear and simple, yet most of the American public cannot see it.  


It is so very clear what this President and his progressive buddies (unions, radicals) are doing to this country.  They are trying to "nudge" you closer and closer to the edge of the cliff until fall off.  Their ultimate goal is a United Socialist States of America.  To take away our God given rights and replace them with Secularist, Government-given rights.  And in order to obtain that goal they will lie like there is no tomorrow.  If this President gains another term there is no stopping him.  He has already said that he doesn't care about Congress and that he will act.  Imagine if there is no threat of reelection to keep him in check.  It's time to stand up to this Government that wants to take away our freedom.  Make it known to them that we are not going down without a fight! 


The video of the speech can be seen here


*N

it's our lot in life...

While listening to local progressive talk radio, a local public union leader made a comment (paraphrased), "...people wouldn't be public employees if they wanted to be millionaires."  That comment says a lot about how the progressives want people to think.  Progressives don't want you to set your sights too high.  Just like President Obama's comment the other day about having "unrealistic dreams."  The collective ideals won't work if too many people think as individuals and look at the American dream as a way to actually become a millionaire.  This quote from the popular Disney movie, A Bugs Life, pretty well sums up the progressive way of thinking, "...It's our lot in life.  It's not a lot but it's our life."

*M

we are here for you...

One of local progressive talk radio's signature talking points seems to be how public unions are working for those workers not in a union.  To some degree and in some ways that may be true.  However, it would be interesting to know how many public union leaders have actually backed up non-union public employees in settings such as a school district since the protests and recall efforts.  Most likely very few.

*M